论文部分内容阅读
《世说新语·文学》:“庾仲初作《扬都赋》,成,以呈庾亮。亮以亲族之怀,大为名其价,云‘可三《二京》,四《三都》’。于此人人竞写。都下纸为之贵。”其中的“三《二京》,四《三都》’,有人不了解《二京》即张衡的《二京赋》,《三都》即左思的《三都赋》,误以为是“三二京,四三都”,“三二”、“四三”为相近的数词连用。有人撰文以辨其非,认为“三”、“四”是用作动词,“可三《二京》,四《三都》”应理解为“可三倍于《二京赋》,四倍于《三都赋》”。后又有人撰文指出,辨非的理解也是错误的,正确的理解应该是“《扬都赋》可与《二京赋》并列而为三,可与《三都赋》并列而为四”。所说虽当,但语焉不详。
“Shi Shuo Xin Yu · Literature”: “庾 Zhong early as” Yangdu Fu “, into, to show bright. ”Everyone competing in writing.“ Paper ”expensive.“ One of the ”three“ two ”four“ three ”, some people do not understand the“ second Beijing ”that Zhang Heng’s“ two Beijing Fu ” “Sandu” or Zuo Si’s “San Du Fu” mistakenly thought it was “three two two, four four are”, “three two”, “four three” for the similar numerals used in conjunction. “Three” and “four” are used as verbs, “three” two “and” three “should be understood as” three times as much as “two Beijing Fu” and four times as “three fu”. Later, some people pointed out that the understanding of non-discrimination is wrong, and the correct understanding should be “” Yangdu Fu “can be tied with” two Beijing Fu “and” three “, and” San Fu "tied for the four. Although the said, but did not elaborate.