论文部分内容阅读
此篇文章借着审视关羽和蓝思洛的男性社谊关系来探讨罗贯中《三国演义》及莫勒理爵士《亚瑟王之死》所呈现的男性社谊欲望的悖论。对映当代西方社谊欲望理论及中国文化中的权力化、政治化之阴/阳二元建构,这两个文本展现不同的社谊欲望论述。在《三国演义》,(男)同性欲望的流动强固了阴/阳社会性别结构,并不影响社会秩序。然而,在《亚瑟王之死》,男人与男人之间的亲密肢体接触立刻引起恐同。再者,在此两个文本中,虽然男性社谊关系,于私或公领域,都被建构成正向社会趋力,它的运作却揭露出它的矛盾、弔诡本质,导致作品中英雄人物政治上的挫败或(男性)社会的瓦解。这两个作品中的男性社谊概念本质上是颠覆性的:在众多社会关系中,男性社谊关系凌驾於异性、家庭关系、乃至于对君主和国家的效忠。
This article explores the paradox of male social desire presented by Luo Guanzhong’s The Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Sir King Arthur’s Arthur’s death by examining the male social relations between Guan Yu and Blue Silo. Reflect the desires theory of contemporary western society and the yin / yang dual construction of power and politicization in Chinese culture. These two texts demonstrate different social desires. In the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, the flow of (male) same-sex desires strengthens the gender structure of the yin / yang and does not affect the social order. However, at the death of King Arthur, close physical contact between man and man immediately aroused homophobia. Furthermore, in both texts, although men’s social relations are established as positive social forces in the private or public domain, their operation exposes their contradictory and paradoxical nature, leading to heroines in the works Political frustration or disintegration of (male) society. The concept of masculinity in these two works is essentially subversive: in many social relationships male social relationships override heterosexuality, family relations, and even allegiance to monarchs and nations.