论文部分内容阅读
前一时期谢晋“蒙难”。朱大可、李劼一纸檄文,指谢晋应予扬弃的陈旧的电影模式,观点招来万千争议。许多电影界乃至文学界人士普遍不满,态度可用“局部或可商榷,总体不能接受”归纳:少数电影工作者鼓掌叫好,态度可用“局部尚嫌不力,总体当然赞同”概括。这个观点颇有嚼头。谢晋“蒙难”对谢晋和谢晋电影可以说是因祸得福,俗人的欣赏物终于在雅士那里有了一席之地(虽则被攻)。然而谢晋“蒙难”对中国的电影评论和电影理论则是绝对微妙的质疑:谢晋的电影既已串成谢晋电影,为什么电影理论拿不出象样的研究,倒是电影批评越俎代庖?
Xie Jin before the “tragedy.” Zhu Da-kai, Li Zhi, a piece of paper, refers to the obsolete movie mode that Xie Jin should give up, and his view provokes thousands of controversies. Many film industry and even literary circles generally dissatisfied with the attitude of “partial or open to question, the overall can not accept the” inductive: applause by a handful of movie workers applause, attitude available “part of the local is still too weak, of course, generally agree with the” general. This view is quite chewy. Xie Jin “Intolerance” Xie Jin and Xie Jin movies can be said to be blessing by the disaster, the appreciation of the laity finally have a place in the Ascot (though the attack). However, Xie Jin’s “hardship” on China’s film criticism and movie theory is absolutely subtle question: Xie Jin’s film has been linked to Xie Jin movie, why the film theory can not be a decent study, it touches on the film criticism more 俎 generation?