论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出纷繁的情报实践与落后的情报理论之间的矛盾,日益突出;情报学研究方法的新潮流,又形成充满悖论的局面。情报学研究方法,或依附于某些新兴学科,或游弋于某些时髦学派.有人褒为坦途捷径,有人贬为一无是处,甚至称为“殖民扩张”或“传染病流行”.对于情报现象,一方面惊呼“知识爆炸”、“情报泛滥”;另一方面则是“知识贫乏”、“情报饥饿”.这是由于运用新方法的技巧不够成熟?还是情报本体与新方法缺少亲和力?或许两者皆有?更新情报学研究方法的愿望,虽然产生于实际,但是,许多方法却是移植、借用来的,而不是对情报本体研究的概括和总结.
First, the question put forward A large number of contradictions between intelligence practice and backward intelligence theory, increasingly prominent; information science research methods of the new trend, but also the formation of a paradox full of the situation. Information science research methods, or attached to some emerging disciplines, or cruise to some of the trendy school.People praise as a shortcut, some people devaluated to nothing, or even called “colonial expansion” or “epidemic of infectious diseases.” For the intelligence phenomenon, The one hand, exclamation “knowledge explosion”, “intelligence proliferation”; the other hand, “lack of knowledge”, “intelligence hunger.” This is due to the application of new methods of technology is not mature enough? Or information ontology and the new method of lack of affinity? Both have the desire to update the research methods of information science, although produced in practice, many of them are transplanted and borrowed instead of summarizing and summarizing the research on information ontology.