论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨诊治急性肾衰竭的临床方法。方法:随机将71例急性肾衰竭者分组:甲急性组(36例)与乙急性组(35例)。对甲急性组经西医肾衰竭医治,对乙急性组经西医+血液净化医治。随后,比较甲急性组与乙急性组的临床疗效。结果:乙急性组的疗效优于甲急性组,P<0.05。此外,乙急性组的Scr情况、Bun情况要比甲急性组好,P<0.05。结论:经血液净化医治急性肾衰竭,疗效好,治愈可能性大,医疗使用价值大,值得推广。
Objective: To explore the clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute renal failure. Methods: 71 patients with acute renal failure were randomly divided into two groups: A acute group (36 cases) and B acute group (35 cases). A group of acute renal failure treated by Western medicine, acute treatment group B by Western medicine + blood purification treatment. Subsequently, compare A acute group and B acute group clinical curative effect. Results: The acute group B is superior to the acute group A, P <0.05. In addition, the acute condition group B Scr, Bun situation better than the acute group, P <0.05. Conclusion: The treatment of acute renal failure by blood purification, good curative effect, the possibility of cure, the use of large medical value, it is worth promoting.