论文部分内容阅读
本文将在圣经、女性主义等的交叉点上开展一个实验。文章将特别关注《哥林多前书》7:25-40,通过对这部分的术语、体裁及结构进行评注,来分析其中对文学语言本质及特征发挥作用的性别意识形态。在此,保罗有关已婚者要承受“身体的/世上的苦难”的观点将同西蒙娜·德·波伏娃《第二性》中有关婚姻、生育及母性等高度含糊的观点进行对话,并由大多数后来的女性主义理论家予以进一步阐述、讨论或批评。保罗和波伏娃都赞同这一点:为了摆脱焦虑和烦恼,最好不要拥有家庭,为了达到更高的世界——道,一定程度的禁欲主义是必须的。波伏娃在女性弃绝婚姻的基础上看到了实现艺术及文本生产的可能性,她认为,退出(再)生产线并从事文本生产,才是女性成为完全人的唯一出路。保罗实际上支持在信基督的男性及女性中间创造剩余价值,此剩余价值是凭借其主人和主而积累起来的,并生成财富及权力;主反过来也被颂赞。保罗及波伏娃所选择的文本生产,仅仅在他人有性生殖世界所累积的剩余价值的基础上才有可能。
This article will carry out an experiment at the intersection of the Bible and feminism. The article will pay special attention to 1 Corinthians 7: 25-40 and analyze the gender ideology in which the nature and characteristics of the literary language play a role, by commenting on the terms, genres, and structures of this section. Here, Paul’s view that married persons are to suffer “physical / world suffering ” will be compared with the highly vague viewpoints of marriage, childbirth and motherhood in Simone de Beauvoir’s “second sex” Dialogue, and most of the later feminist theorists to further elaborate, discuss or criticize. Both Paul and Beauvoir agree: To get out of anxiety and trouble, it is best not to have a family, and in order to reach a higher world-a certain amount of asceticism is a must. Beauvoir saw the possibility of art and text production on the basis of women’s rejection of marriage. She believes that withdrawing (re) production lines and engaging in text production are the only ways for women to become completely human. Paul actually supports the creation of surplus-value among the men and women of Christ, who, by virtue of their masters and the Lord, accumulates surplus wealth and power and the Lord is praised. The production of the texts chosen by Paul and Beauvoir was possible only on the basis of the residual value accumulated in the sexual reproduction of others.