论文部分内容阅读
《中学数学教学参考》2005年第8期,发表了课例《不等式的性质(第三课时)》,让读者点评.并在当年第11、12期刊登了所收40余篇点评稿中有代表性的14篇.笔者反复阅读了这14篇文章,找出了其中共同讨论的或当今课程和教学论广泛关注的一些关键词,进行了统计分析,现将统计分析结果与大家探讨.1 统计分析的初衷对一个课例的评析,往往因不同评论者的不同观察角度会有不同的看法,正所谓“仁者见仁,智者见智”.但在诸多文章中集中反映出来的观点和看法却一定代表了某种共识,这种共识体现着不同教师的教
“High School Mathematics Teaching Reference” 2005 the eighth period, published the lesson “the nature of inequality (the third class hour)”, let the reader comment.And in the 11th, 12 published more than 40 articles included Representative of the 14. The author repeatedly read the 14 articles, to identify the common discussion or the current curriculum and teaching a number of key words of widespread concern, conducted a statistical analysis, the statistical analysis results are discussed with you .1 The original intention of statistical analysis of a lesson evaluation, often due to different reviewers have different views of different perspectives, is the so-called “benevolent benevolence, wisdom see wisdom.” But in many articles reflect the views and opinions It must represent a consensus that embodies the teaching of different teachers