论文部分内容阅读
(接上期)三、反向混淆的法律适用关于对反向混淆类案件的法律适用,不同法院存在不同的认识,主要表现为:1、认为反向混淆仅理论有,法律未规定;2、适用《商标法》(2001年)第52条第1款认定侵权;3、适用《商标法》第28条,多集中于商标异议及驳回复审行政程序中;4、依据《商标法》(2001年)第52条第5款、《商标法实施条例》第50条、《最高人民法院关于审理商标民事纠纷案件适用法律若
(Connected to the previous period) Third, the application of the law of reverse confusion On the legal application of reverse confusion cases, different courts have different understanding, mainly as follows: 1, that the reverse confusion theory only, the law does not provide; Applying Article 52 (1) of the Trademark Law (2001) to determine infringement; (3) Applying Article 28 of the Trademark Law, which focuses more on trademark oppositions and refusals and reexaminations; (4) Pursuant to the Trademark Law (2001) Year) Article 52, paragraph 5, Article 50 of the Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law, "The Law of the Supreme People’s Court on the Trial of Civil Disputes over Trademarks If