论文部分内容阅读
几年前,我曾写文章呼吁“要加强写作理论史的研究”。当时确是感到,写作学研究中与“理论兴趣减退”相随共生的,还有一种“历史研究淡出”的倾向。这可以从两个明显的现象上看出:一是,大同小异的教材数以百计,但专著和论文之数无法与之构成相应的比例;而在著作之中,又以“论著”为主,“史著”之少寥若晨星。与此相联系的第二种现象是——许多教材、论著推出的设想、框架、体系,往往不是研究科学事实之后的发现,而是纯粹出自个人头脑的发明。逻辑建构等同于空中结网,不去接触本学科的历史内容。这样的理论,由于缺乏历史维度,到头来不
A few years ago, I wrote an article calling for “strengthening the study of the history of writing.” At that time, I really felt that there was a tendency of “fading out of historical research” in the study of writing and the “synergy of theoretical interest”. This can be seen from two obvious phenomena: First, hundreds of similar textbooks, but the number of monographs and essays can not constitute a corresponding ratio; and among the writings, but also to “treatises” mainly , “History” of the few and if Morningstar. The second phenomenon associated with this is that many textbooks, ideas, frameworks and systems put forward by the essay are often not the discovery of scientific facts, but the invention of purely personal minds. Logical construction is equivalent to air networking, not to touch the historical content of this discipline. Such a theory, because of a lack of historical dimensions, does not come at all