论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨无创助产护理技术在降低产妇疼痛中的应用效果。方法选择本院2014年2—11月在本院分娩的100名产妇作为研究对象,并随机分为对照组与干预组各50名。对照组采用传统助产方法;干预组采用无创助产护理技术的治疗方法。对两组研究对象生产后会阴伤口情况及疼痛程度进行比较。计量资料比较采用t检验,计数资料比较采用χ2检验,等级资料比较采用两独立样本的Wilcoxon秩和检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果对照组产妇有19名(38.00%)出现会阴水肿,多于干预组的9名(18.00%)产妇,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.960,P<0.05)。对照组产妇会阴伤口疼痛天数为(15.2±3.2)d,明显长于干预组的(7.1±2.1)d,差异有统计学意义(t=14.964,P<0.05)。两组研究对象疼痛程度比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=32.431,P<0.05)。结论对产妇采用无创助产护理技术,能够有效降低产妇的疼痛程度,且对产妇会阴的伤害较小,值得临床推广和应用。
Objective To explore the effect of non-invasive midwifery nursing in reducing maternal pain. Methods A total of 100 maternal births in our hospital from February to November 2014 were selected as study subjects and randomly assigned to 50 in each of the control group and the intervention group. The control group used the traditional midwifery method; the intervention group used the non-invasive midwifery care technique. The production of perineal wounds and the degree of pain in the two groups were compared. Measurement data were compared using t test, count data were compared using χ2 test, grade data using two independent samples Wilcoxon rank sum test, P <0.05 for the difference was statistically significant. Results Nineteen (38.00%) women in control group had perineal edema, which was more than 9 (18.00%) women in intervention group. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.960, P <0.05). The number of days of perineal wound pain in the control group was (15.2 ± 3.2) d, which was significantly longer than that of the intervention group (7.1 ± 2.1) d, the difference was statistically significant (t = 14.964, P <0.05). The pain scores of the two groups were statistically significant (Z = 32.431, P <0.05). Conclusion The use of noninvasive midwifery care techniques for maternal mothers can effectively reduce the degree of maternal pain and has less harm to the perineum. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.