论文部分内容阅读
问题的提出这是《应激情况下受暗示性强的被试与弱的被试手指温度的变化》(《心理科学通讯》1990年第2期)一文的姐妹篇。我们在上一个实验研究中发现:“虽然两组在恢复期第10分钟末的变率温度值之间无统计上的显著差异,但两组在恢复速度上的差异似乎暗示:受暗示性强的被试交感神经兴奋性的灵活转变程度大于受暗示性弱的被试,也就是更容易因环境刺激的变化而变化;而受暗示性弱的被试有较大的惰性”。其次,我们设想,受暗示性强的被试是较理想的心理训练、特别是生物反馈放松训练的对象。他们比受暗示性弱的被试易于接受训练,并能有效地用学到的放松方法去对付应激。为了验证这一分析和设想的正确性,我们在上一次实验的基础
The question is raised “This is a sister section to the article” Changes in temperature of fingers impaired subjects under stress conditions and weak subjects “(” Psychological Science Newsletter “, No. 2, 1990). We found in a previous experimental study that ”although there was no statistically significant difference between the rate of change in temperature at the end of the 10-minute recovery period, the difference in recovery rates between the two groups seemed to suggest that the implied strong Of the tested subjects had more flexible changes of sympathetic excitement than those who were less suggestive of weakness, that is, they were more likely to change due to the changes of environmental stimuli. However, those who were implicitly weak showed greater inertia. Second, we assume that implicated subjects are the ideal psychological training, especially the object of relaxation training of biological feedback. They were less likely to be trained than those who were less suggestive and were able to deal effectively with the relaxation they learned. In order to verify the correctness of this analysis and assumptions, we have the basis of the previous experiment