论文部分内容阅读
孰是孰非之外,微软的案子至少说明了一个问题,用户对垄断和可能的垄断有着本能的反感。用户需要选择,IT也象其他产业一样,要有竞争、要有分工。数年前曾被一度推崇的由一家厂商提供“Total Solution”的概念,已日渐式微。但这并不表明用户已经失去了对方案的兴趣和依赖,“上帝”依然是苛刻的“上帝”,他们需要的是性价比更好、连接更无“缝”、还要具有可选性的方案构成。于是,对于那些相信“同行可以为
In fact, Microsoft’s case at least illustrates one problem. Users have an instinctive dislike of monopoly and possible monopoly. Users need to choose. IT, like other industries, needs competition and division of labor. The concept of “Total Solution” provided by a company that was once highly praised a few years ago has gradually declined. However, this does not mean that users have lost interest and reliance on the program. “God” is still the harsh “God”. What they need is a more cost-effective solution, a connection that is more seamless, and an alternative solution. constitute. So, for those who believe that "the peers can be