论文部分内容阅读
近日,我们在《中国微循环》1997年第一期上读到一篇题为《我国甲皱微循环研究方法评价》（以下简称《评价》）的文章[1].作为学术问题的争论，我们认为其对学科发展不无裨益，有些问题也正是需要我们探讨和解决的，但是文中某些重要观点及提法不太恰当，我们认为《评价》的作者
Recently, we read an article titled “Evaluation of the Research Methods of Nail Fold Microcirculation in China” (hereinafter referred to as “Evaluation”) in the first issue of “Microcirculation in China” in 1997. As a controversy over academic issues, We think it is not good for the development of disciplines, some of the problems that we need to explore and solve, but the text some of the important ideas and formulations are not appropriate, we think “evaluation” of the author