论文部分内容阅读
80年代开始的“东亚奇迹”使得儒耶比较日益成为东西学界共同关注的热点。从研究方法看,比较可分为历史进路和哲学进路两种。历史进路的儒耶比较侧重于从基督教在华传播史的角度透视儒耶观念的差异或相似。哲学进路的儒耶比较,就笔者所见,从利玛窦一直到上世纪80年代,都不脱“格义”的套路(例如拿孔子和耶稣作对比,讨论到底是“人而神”还是“神而人”~①);到了90年代,随着Lee H.Yearley的Mencius and Aquinas:Theories of
The “East Asian Miracle” that began in the 1980s made Confucianism and Confucianism more and more the hot spot of common concern in Eastern and Western academic circles. From the perspective of research methods, the comparison can be divided into two historical path and philosophical approach. Confucianism in the historical process focuses more on the differences or similarities of the concept of Confucianism from the perspective of the spread of Christianity in China. Compared with the Confucianism of the philosophical approach, as far as I can see, from Matteo Ricci to the 1980s, neither does the concept of “justice and justice” (for example, compare Confucius with Jesus, And God “or” God and man "~ ①); By the 90s, with Lee H. Yearley’s Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of