论文部分内容阅读
我国的经济法中的风险控制的模式与美国的规制理论在一定程度上有一定的对应性。风险规制主要以“风险”为研究对象进行研究,研究风险产生的原因以寻求规避的方法。风险的规制涉及到生活的方方面面,如食品安全、环境健康等,是一门综合的科学,是社会性规制的范式革命。随着社会生活的进步,风险的来源发生了变化,使传统的法律体系不能够应对风险的发生。现代社会主要通过两种途径来保证人民的风险危机,一种是提前预防,把风险消弭于无形,另外一种是通过社会安全网的建设对风险受害人承担相应的责任。风险的预防是主要的解决办法,风险具有二重性,在分析风险因素的时候需要区分风险的价值与事实,在民主的环境下进行风险的沟通,使风险分析的过程既有科学性又有民主性。目前,我国处于风险的爆发期,经济法学在相关议题上的话语权取决于对风险规制范式的移植,以实现能够回应风险社会的自我革命。
The model of risk control in our country’s economic law has some degree of correspondence with the theory of regulation in the United States. Risk regulation mainly focuses on “risk ” as the research object, and studies the causes of the risk to find ways to avoid it. Risk regulation involves all aspects of life, such as food safety, environmental health, is a comprehensive science, is a paradigm revolution of social regulation. With the improvement of social life, the sources of risk have changed so that the traditional legal system can not cope with the risks. In modern society, there are mainly two ways to guarantee the people’s risk crisis. One is to prevent in advance and remove the risk from being invisible. The other is to take the corresponding responsibility to the victims of the risk through the construction of social safety net. Risk prevention is the main solution, the risk has duality, in the analysis of risk factors need to distinguish between the value of the risk and the fact that in a democratic environment for risk communication, the risk analysis process is both scientific and democratic . At present, our country is in the risk of the outbreak, economic law on the issues related to the right to speak depends on the paradigm of the transplant of risk in order to achieve a risk-response society to self-revolution.