论文部分内容阅读
最近几年,我国哲学界在总结建国以来的经验教训时,出现了一种似乎很有影响的看法。这种看法在借口尊重唯物主义的时候,极力贬低人的主观能动性在社会历史发展中的作用。诚然,持这种看法的人一般地也是承认主观能动性的作用的,甚至承认它有很大作用。但是,他们却决意地否认主观能动性在一定条件下,对社会历史的发展具有决定性作用,他们认为,“决定作用”的提法在理论上是错误的,在实践上则是十分有害的。(见:《哲学专题学术报告汇集》第17页。云南大学政治系编)。 人的主观能动性在一定条件下有没有决定作用?这是当前哲学界在评价主观能动性作用问题上所面临的一个焦点。对这个问题的重新认识,牵涉到对生产力与生产关系,经济基础
In recent years, when the philosophical circles of our country summed up the experiences and lessons since the founding of the People's Republic, there appeared a seemingly influential view. This view, while preempting respect for materialism, strongly detracts from the role of human subjective initiative in the development of social history. Admittedly, those who hold this view are generally also recognizing the role of subjective initiative, and even admitting that it has a great effect. However, they are determined to deny that subjective initiative under certain conditions has a decisive effect on the development of social history. They think that the formulation of “decisive function” is theoretically wrong and in practice is very harmful. (See: Collection of Philosophical Symposia, p. 17, Department of Political Science, Yunnan University). Is there any decisive role that people's subjective initiative has under certain conditions? This is the focus of the philosophical community in evaluating the role of subjective initiative. A new understanding of this issue involves the relationship between productive forces and production and the economic foundation