论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察比较布洛芬混悬液与复方氨林巴比妥注射液的临床疗效。方法:选择有高热症状的急性上呼吸道感染患儿(腋温≥39.5℃)120例随机分成布洛芬混悬液治疗组80例和复方氨林巴比妥注射液对照组40例治疗。结果:治疗组总有效率98.75%,对照组总有效率85.00%(χ2=9.19,P<0.05)。治疗组退热疗效评分均数为2.98±0.18,对照组退热疗效评分为2.72±0.64,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。用药后1~4 h两组退热效果比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。结论:布洛芬混悬液退热快、作用强、维持时间长,对咽痛、头痛也有缓解疗效。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of ibuprofen suspension and compound Aminobarbital injection. Methods: A total of 120 children with acute upper respiratory tract infection (axillary temperature≥39.5 ℃) with high fever were randomly divided into ibuprofen suspension group (n = 80) and compound Aminobarbital injection (n = 40). Results: The total effective rate was 98.75% in the treatment group and 85.00% in the control group (χ2 = 9.19, P <0.05). The average score of antipyretic effect in treatment group was 2.98 ± 0.18, while the control group was 2.72 ± 0.64, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). 1 ~ 4 h after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P all <0.01). Conclusion: The ibuprofen suspension has the advantages of rapid antipyretic effect, strong effect and long-term maintenance on sore throat and headache.