论文部分内容阅读
北京市人大代表、北京市当代律师事务所律师卫爱民建议,“公立医院实行学生堕胎免费制,或象征性收取小额治疗费。家长、学校、社会、政府多方出力,关心这些孩子。”他同时呼吁,应禁止各种媒体与大众平台刊发人工流产广告,尤其是那种类似“无痛人流、不影响学习”等带有宣传意味的广告。(11月25日《北京晨报》)对于青春期孩子的早恋与偷尝禁果行为,“堵不如疏”应该是社会共识。卫爱民律师“公立医院实行学生堕胎免费制”的建议,其“疏导”善意显而易见:即以公立医院的“免费堕胎”招徕学生避开“小
Beijing Municipal People’s Congress, Beijing contemporary law firm lawyer Wei Aimin suggested that ”public hospitals to implement abortion free of charge for students, or a nominal charge for micro-treatment. Parents, schools, community, government and more efforts to care about these children. At the same time, he also urged that various media and mass platforms should be banned from issuing abortion advertisements, especially those propaganda advertisements similar to “painless, learning-without-learning.” (Beijing Morning Post, November 25) For the puppy love and steal of forbidden fruit for adolescent children, it is social consensus that “blocking is inferior.” Wei Aimin lawyer “public hospital practice of abortion free student ” proposal, its “counseling ” goodwill is obvious: public hospital “free abortion ” to attract students to avoid "small