论文部分内容阅读
目的本文将针对SPP和TURP两种手术方法对BPH患者的治疗情况进行比较总结。方法收集100例BPH患者,随机分成两组,给予SPP和TURP两种手术方法,记录各种比较的指标,用SPSS18.0统计软件进行统计学分析,采用t检验比较两组的QOL评分、IPSS评分、剩余尿量、最大尿流率等各指标;计量资料的比较采用卡方检验,P<0.05具有统计学意义,相反则无统计学意义。结果两治疗组手术前后QOL评分、IPSS评分、剩余尿量、最大尿流率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),SPP组和TURP组相比较,两者最大尿流率、剩余尿量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 BPH的治疗采用TURP的综合优势比SPP明显,有很重要的临床应用价值。
Objective This article will be SPP and TURP two surgical methods for the treatment of patients with BPH were summarized. Methods 100 cases of BPH were collected and randomly divided into two groups. SPO and TURP were given to the patients. Various indexes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS18.0 statistical software. The QOL scores, IPSS Score, residual urine volume, maximum flow rate and other indicators; comparison of measurement data using the chi-square test, P <0.05 with statistical significance, on the contrary, no significant difference. Results There were significant differences in QOL score, IPSS score, residual urine volume and maximum urinary flow rate between the two treatment groups before and after surgery (P <0.05). Compared with TURP group, the maximum urinary flow rate, residual urine volume The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The comprehensive advantage of TURP in the treatment of BPH is more obvious than that of SPP, which has a very important clinical value.