论文部分内容阅读
刑事司法改革需要审限制度提供保障,而诉讼拖延问题则是产生审限压力的重要原因。两大法系国家虽然没有规定刑事审判期限,但通过迅速审判模式和集中审理模式严格控制诉讼中程序拖延。两种控制模式在立法体例、价值取向、规制阶段、控制方式和救济途径上存在明显差异,但同时也在高效理念、审查方式和个人责任等方面分享共同的制度设计。我国改革可以因案而异设置不同的审判期限,但如果在特殊案件中废除审限的话,就必须强调集中审理原则。此外,法庭应当严格审查延期审理的事由,减少各种制度外的拖延。
The reform of criminal justice needs the judicial review system to provide the guarantee, and the lawsuit procrastination problem is the important reason that causes the pressure of judicial review. Although the two legal systems did not stipulate the deadline for criminal trial, they strictly controlled the procedural delay in the proceedings through a speedy trial mode and a centralized trial mode. The two control modes have obvious differences in legislation system, value orientation, regulation stage, control mode and relief channel, but also share common system design in terms of high-efficiency idea, examination method and individual responsibility. Our country’s reform may set different trial deadlines depending on the circumstances of the case, but if abolition of the judicial review in a special case, we must emphasize the principle of central hearing. In addition, the courts should scrutinize the reasons for the adjournment and reduce procrastination beyond the various systems.