论文部分内容阅读
1989年5月～1990年10月,我们对胃泰康治疗消化性溃疡进行了临床观察,并以甲氰咪胍为对照,现报道如下。材料与方法一、病例选择:将胃镜确诊的56例活动性消化性溃疡随机分为二组,胃泰康组28例,其中胃溃疡5例,十二指肠球部溃疡20例,复合性溃疡3例;甲氰咪胍组28例,其中胃溃疡7例,十二指肠球部溃疡19例,复合性溃疡2例。两组在年龄、性别、职业、病程、吸烟史等方面无明显差异,表明资料具有可比性。
From May 1989 to October 1990, we conducted a clinical observation of Weitaikang in the treatment of peptic ulcer, and compared with cimetidine, we report the following. Materials and methods A case selection: 56 cases of active peptic ulcer diagnosed by gastroscopy were randomly divided into two groups, the stomach Taikang group of 28 cases, including 5 cases of gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer in 20 cases, complex ulcer 3 cases; cimetidine group 28 cases, including gastric ulcer in 7 cases, duodenal ulcer in 19 cases, 2 cases of complex ulcer. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, occupation, course of disease and smoking history, indicating that the data were comparable.