论文部分内容阅读
某专业期刊上曾发表过一篇名为《新公文种类设置得与失的探讨》(以下简称“《探讨》”)的署名文章。该文针对《国家行政机关公文处理办法》(以下简称“新《办法》”)中对于。“通知”文种适用范围的修改提出几点质疑:(1)认为当前“各级机关发布法规性文件包括本机关制定的规定、制度或领导同志讲话、报告等”就是发布“规章”,而且“长期以来,……都是用通知发布的”,现新《办法》中“通知‘发布规章’的用法被取消不知何故”?(2)“新《办法》中有‘发布规章’用法的文种现只有‘命令’,使人们产生这样一个疑问:以后各机关发布‘规章’不能使用通知而只能使用‘命令’?
A professional journal has published a signed article titled “Discussion on the Set-up and Loss of New Document Types” (hereinafter referred to as “Discussion”). This article aims at “Measures for the Administration of Official Documents of the State Administration” (hereinafter referred to as the “New Measures”). (1) It is considered that “the regulations, rules or regulations, or speeches and reports issued by regulatory authorities at various levels of the government at various levels, including the regulations and systems formulated by the authorities, ”For a long time, ... all were issued by notice,“ and somehow the use of the ”notice of the release regulation“ in the new ”Measures“ was canceled somehow. ”(2) There are“ usage regulations ”in the“ new ”approach There is only a ’command’ in the language, which raises the question of whether people can only use the ’order’ after they have released the ’regulation’ they can not use the notification.