论文部分内容阅读
新修订的刑事诉讼法虽然确立了公诉案件和解制度,初步解决了公诉案件和解的法律依据问题,但是,和解的制度规定仍然原则粗疏,缺乏可操作性。主要存在对和解适用的诉讼阶段和具体适用程序没有作出明确规定,导致界限不清、可操作性不强;对和解程序的监督是否由检察机关实施没有明确规定等问题。因此,需要一方面在立法及司法层面明确公诉案件和解的基本原则,防止制度走偏;明确公诉案件和解适用的诉讼阶段和一般程序,增强制度的明确性和可操作性;明确检察机关对公诉案件和解的监督权,确保制度公正。另一方面调整各地司法的实践,统一使用“公诉案件和解”的概念;改变和解达成的方式,由公检法机关主持制作和解协议书,以确保制度顺利实施。
Although the newly revised Criminal Procedure Law establishes the system of reconciliation in public prosecution cases, it initially resolves the legal basis of reconciliation of public prosecution cases. However, the system of reconciliation rules are still out of principle and lacks maneuverability. The main existence of the litigation stage for the settlement and the specific application of the procedure did not make it clear that the definition of unclear, operability is not strong; the reconciliation process supervision is not implemented by the procuratorial organs is not clearly defined and other issues. Therefore, on the one hand, it is necessary to clarify the basic principles of reconciliation of public prosecution cases at the legislative and judicial levels so as to prevent the system from deviating; clarify the applicable litigation phases and general procedures of public prosecution cases and enhance the clarity and operability of the system; The right to supervise the case reconciliation to ensure that the system is fair. On the other hand, it adjusted the practice of judiciary in different places and used the concept of “reconciliation of public prosecution cases” uniformly; changed the way of reconciliation reached and public security organs presided over the production of reconciliation agreements to ensure the smooth implementation of the system.