论文部分内容阅读
微信商标异议复审行政纠纷一案(简称微信案),一审判决后引起的知识产权界的强烈反响,甚至可以说是反对声一片。当然也有支持的声音,但反对是主流。但当我们拨开表面的纷争,探究纷争产生的真正原因,凝视本案的事实与判决理由,就会发现这是一个具有里程碑意义的案件。因为这个案件实际上是对先申请原则的修正,是对商标自然属性的尊重,也是商标理性回归的必然结果。本文将就案件的事实、背景、判决的真正原因及法律适用、反对的理由、本案没有解决的问题进行讨论,并进一步讨论商标先申请原则的缺陷以及解决途径。
Weixin trademark opposition review administrative dispute case (referred to as WeChat case), after the first instance verdict caused by the strong reaction of the intellectual property community, and even can be argued that the opposition is a. Of course, there is supportive voices, but opposition is the mainstream. However, when we open up confrontations on the surface, explore the real causes of the disputes, and gaze at the facts of the case and the reasons for the judgments, we find that this is a landmark case. Because this case is actually an amendment to the principle of first application, it is a respect for the natural attribute of the trademark and an inevitable result of the rational return of the trademark. This article will discuss the facts of the case, the background, the real reason of the verdict and the application of the law, the reasons for the opposition and the problems that the case is not resolved, and further discuss the shortcomings and solutions to the principle of first application of the trademark.