论文部分内容阅读
19、20世纪之交,美国进入工业社会,科技发明、城市化和新闻业的发展影响了传统的隐私状况。催生了新的隐私诉求。新闻报刊无度地侵犯私人生活,引起美国中产阶级精英人士的不满,在他们之中形成了一种“私人生活不受打扰”的个人权利观念。然而在具体司法实践之中,这种权利观念并未被普遍接受。纽约州上诉法院在1902年“罗伯森诉罗切斯特折叠纸盒公司案”中,明确拒绝了隐私权的存在,引起了社会的不满,促使纽约州通过了保护隐私的州法令。此后,在其他州也相继出现了支持隐私权的判例和立法。不过,最终形成的隐私权利偏离了原先的构想,仅仅禁止盗用姓名、肖像和照片的行为。这一结果,根植于世纪之交美国社会对言论出版自由的重视、大众社会与阶级分化的形成、财产权利和个人权利的冲突之中。
At the turn of the 20th and 20th centuries, the United States entered an industrial society and the development of science and technology, urbanization and journalism affected its traditional privacy. Born a new privacy appeal. Newspapers and magazines infringing on their private lives unduly have aroused the dissatisfaction of the middle-class elites in the United States, and they have formed among themselves a notion of personal rights that “does not disturb private life.” However, in specific judicial practice, this notion of rights is not universally accepted. The New York State Court of Appeal explicitly rejected the existence of privacy in the 1902 Robson v. Rochester Folding Carton Company, causing public dissatisfaction and urging the State of New York to pass state protections for privacy. Since then, other states have also appeared in support of privacy cases and legislation. However, the resulting privacy right departed from its original concept and merely prohibited the theft of names, portraits and photos. This result is rooted in the conflict between American society's emphasis on the freedom of speech and press, the formation of mass society and class differentiation, property rights, and individual rights at the turn of the century.