论文部分内容阅读
类比和对比同属行之有效的说理论述的方法。然而,两者所要达到的目标和效能却有所不同。 在具体写作中,运用类比方法就是将有相似特点的事物放在一起比较,从而将它们的共同的实质形象而又机智地显示出来。如果说,对比说理旨在将性质各异的客体放在一起对照,以形成是非得失的鲜明反差,侧重于求异;那么,类比评析则是重在对形式各异、性质类似的事物间的有机联系和分析比较,以显示其相似之处,侧重于求同。
Analogy and contrast are equally valid methods of argumentation. However, the goals and performance to be achieved by both are different. In concrete writing, the use of analogy is to compare things that share similar traits and display their common realities in a witty way. If we say that comparative reasoning aims at bringing objects of different nature together to form a sharp contrast between gains and losses and focusing on seeking differences, then analogical analysis focuses on the difference between things of a different kind and of a similar nature Organic links and analysis compare to show similarities, focusing on seeking the same.