论文部分内容阅读
在经典格赖斯意义理论中,“所言”与“所含”形成绝对的二元对照,最终陷入所谓的“格赖斯循环”。为了消解格赖斯循环,后格赖斯理论家作出了种种探索。其中Récanati基于真值条件语用学对“所言”及其与“所含”关系的阐释颇具特色。这种“所言”观彻底打破了句法相关性限制的束缚,全面关注语用过程在“所言”形成中的作用,充分重视言语活动参与者交际意向对识解“所言”的影响,着力使关于“所言”以及相关概念的理论阐述更符合语言使用者的语言直觉。
In the theory of classical Grice meaning, “said ” and “contained ” form an absolute binary contrast, and ultimately fall into the so-called “Grice cycle ”. In order to eliminate the Grice cycle, post-Grice theoreticians made a variety of exploration. Which Récanati based on truth-conditional pragmatics of “said ” and its “contained ” interpretation of the characteristics of. The concept of “asserting” thoroughly breaks the shackles of syntactic relevance restrictions, pays close attention to the role of pragmatic process in the formation of “language ”, pays full attention to the communicative intention of participants in speech activities to understand “ Language ”, and make efforts to make the theoretical exposition about “ say ”and related concepts more in line with the language intuition of language users.