论文部分内容阅读
目的探究预防并控制血站感染的管理对策。方法选取2014年1月-2015年1月在云浮市中心血站未加强感染管理前的献血人员40例,作为对照组,选取2015年2月后加强感染管理的献血人员41例,作为观察组。观察并比较两组血站感染控制情况以及采血人员手消毒、献血人员皮肤消毒情况。结果观察组的环境物体表面感染控制率(97.56%)、操作室空气感染控制率(95.12%)、灭菌器械感染控制率(100.00%)、贮血设备感染控制率(97.56%)以及采血人员手消毒合格率(97.56%)、献血人员皮肤消毒合格率(100.00%)均高于对照组的环境物体表面感染控制率(82.50%)、操作室空气感染控制率(80.00%)、灭菌器械感染控制率(85.00%)、贮血设备感染控制率(97.56%)以及采血人员手消毒合格率(85.00%)、献血人员皮肤消毒合格率(90.00%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论加强血站感染管理能够有效控制感染的发生,保证采血与献血人员的安全。
Objective To explore management strategies to prevent and control blood-stasis infection. Methods From January 2014 to January 2015, 40 donors of blood donors who had not been infected in the blood center of Yunfu City were selected as the control group, and 41 blood donors to strengthen infection management after February 2015 were selected as the observation group . Observed and compared blood-control infection in both groups as well as hand-disinfected blood donors, blood donors and skin disinfection. Results The rate of surface infection control (97.56%), air pollution control rate (95.12%), infection control rate of sterilization equipment (100.00%), infection control rate of blood storage equipment (97.56%), The rate of hand disinfection (97.56%) and blood donors’ skin disinfection (100.00%) were higher than that of control group (82.50%), control rate of operating room air infection (80.00%), sterilization equipment The rate of infection control (85.00%), infection control rate of blood storage equipment (97.56%), hand disinfection pass rate (85.00%) of blood collection personnel and skin pass rate of blood donors (90.00%) were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Strengthening blood bank infection management can effectively control the infection and ensure the safety of blood collection and blood donation.