论文部分内容阅读
《四库全书总目·史部诏令奏议类·包孝肃奏议十卷》有误,(以下简称《奏议》)已历三勘。一勘于《辨志文会》初集。费德宗所勘有三,(一)张田分类本为三十一门,《总目》误作三十。(二)《总目》据田序驳正《宋志》,奏议当为十卷,此误陈振孙《直斋书录解题》已加以纠正。(三)以明刻本为据,疑张田编本不是《奏议》全本。二勘于胡玉缙《四库全书总目提要补正》(以下简称《补正》)。《补正》辑录费氏之说,又略加补说。关于奏议的分门编类问题,就费氏推测《总目》分列门数生误的原因,补为:“今合肥李氏刊本,明礼门目录亦误体,集中不误。”关于奏议版本序跋问题补注,明代四种
The Sikuquanshu Headquarter Departmental History of Chaos Decree, Baoxiao Su played a volume of ten “is wrong, (hereinafter referred to as” play “) has been three surveys. A survey in the ”Zhi Zhi Wen Hui,“ the first episode. Feder Zong survey there are three, (a) Zhang Tien classified as thirty-one, ”Head“ mistaken for thirty. (2) According to the order of the land, ”Head of the Book of Songs“ is refuted ”Song Zhi“ in ”Head of the Order,“ and when it is ten volumes, it is mistaken for Chen Zhen Sun’s ”Direct Book Catalog Solving Problems“ has been corrected. (C) based on the moment of the Ming Dynasty, Zhang Tian is not suspected of ”playing“ the whole. Two surveys in Hu Yujin, ”Sikuquanshu headline correction“ (hereinafter referred to as ”correction“). ”Correction“ series Fei said, added a little more. On the issue of the clan categorized brackets, Fei reasoned that ”the head“ of the reasons for the misclassification of the door, make up: ”This Hefei Li’s catalog, Ming Li Men directory is also incorrect, not wrong." Notes on the version of preface Postscript Postscript, four kinds of the Ming Dynasty