论文部分内容阅读
我院有一位左下颌关节炎的病人,作局部蜡疗,因操作不慎,有温度高达60度的蜡液流入左外耳道内,当时曾多次在局麻下取异物未成。院外会诊,有的主张耳后切开,有的主张全麻下刮除。我们考虑这两种方法虽然可以取出异物,但结果会给病人带来不应有的痛苦,或者可能引起其他不良后果。我们查阅有关材料证明,乙醚可溶化石蜡。经临床试用居然成功。现报告如下:患者范××,外耳道被石蜡塞满,石蜡巳成固体,除当时取出黄豆大小两块外,可见外耳道软骨部呈二度烫伤,骨部仍被一部份石蜡附着,与表皮
Our hospital has a patient with left mandibular arthritis, for local wax therapy, due to improper operation, a temperature of up to 60 degrees of wax fluid into the left external auditory canal, was repeatedly taken under local anesthesia foreign matter failed. Hospital consultation, and some advocates cut ear, and some advocate curettage. We consider these two methods although the foreign body can be removed, but the results will cause undue suffering to the patient, or may cause other adverse consequences. We check the material proof, ether soluble wax. After clinical trials actually successful. The report is as follows: Patient × ×, the external auditory meatus is stuffed with paraffin, wax has become solid, in addition to remove the size of the two pieces of soybeans at the time, showing the external auditory canal cartilage was second degree scald, bone is still part of the paraffin attachment,