论文部分内容阅读
我国《反不正当竞争法》第5条第2款规定:经营者不得擅自使用他人知名商品特有名称或使用与知名商品特有名称相近似的名称从事市场交易,损害竞争对手。该条规定充分肯定了知名商品拥有人对其商品特有名称享有专用权。确定“商品名称”专用,在我国立法中这是首次,在世界各国立法中也极为罕见。笔者推测立法意图,此条规定是出于保护我国在特定历史条件下形成的“知名商品特有名称”这一特殊现象而设,但该条规定不合法理,它的适用,将会影响我国市场竞争机制的正常运行以及导致我国知识产权保护体系的混乱。为完善我国立法,研究“商品名称”实属必要。
Paragraph 2 of Article 5 of China’s Anti-Unfair Competition Law stipulates that operators shall not engage in market transactions or damage competitors by arbitrarily using the peculiar names of other people’s famous products or using names similar to the peculiar names of the well-known products. This article provides for the affirmation of the exclusive right of the owner of a good name to the distinctive name of a good. It is the first time that the “name of commodity” is determined to be the sole one in our country’s legislation and is extremely rare in the legislation of other countries in the world. The author speculates that the legislative intent, this article is out of protection for our country under the specific historical conditions formed “unique name of well-known goods,” this special phenomenon, but the article provides for illegal law, its application will affect our market The normal operation of the competition mechanism and the chaos that led to the protection of intellectual property in our country. In order to perfect our legislation, it is necessary to study “the name of commodity”.