论文部分内容阅读
目的对比纵隔肿瘤患者采用胸腔镜与传统手术治疗的效果。方法 74例原发性纵隔肿瘤患者,随机分为实验组(38例,采取胸腔镜手术治疗)和对照组(36例,采取传统开腹手术治疗)。对比两组治疗效果。结果实验组手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量均优于对照组(P<0.05),两组肿瘤直径比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论原发性纵隔肿瘤患者接受胸腔镜治疗,创口小、疗效显著、安全性高、出血少、疼痛程度较轻、并发症少,值得临床上广泛应用。
Objective To compare the effects of thoracoscope and conventional surgery in patients with mediastinal tumors. Methods Seventy - four patients with primary mediastinal tumor were randomly divided into experimental group (38 cases, thoracoscope surgery) and control group (36 cases, treated with conventional laparotomy). Compare the two groups treatment effect. Results The operation time, incision length and intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in tumor diameter between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusions The patients with primary mediastinal tumors underwent thoracoscopic treatment. The wounds are small, the curative effect is obvious, the safety is high, the bleeding is less, the degree of pain is less and the complication is less. It is worth widely used in clinic.