论文部分内容阅读
目的研究急诊护理路径对急性心肌梗死抢救效果的影响。方法本院2014年2月至2016年12月救治的80例急性心肌梗死患者分为两组各40例,对照组给予常规护理路径,观察组给予急诊护理路径,比较两组患者的评估时间、急诊停留时间、抢救时间、住院时间及院内心肌梗死复发和再PCI情况。结果两组评估时间、急诊停留时间、抢救时间和住院时间的对比具有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组和对照组院内心肌梗死复发率为4.4%和17.8%,再PCI发生率为6.7%和22.2%,对比具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论急诊护理路径能够缩短急诊和抢救时间,减少操作失误和不良事件,值得临床大力推广和应用。
Objective To study the effect of emergency nursing pathway on the rescue of acute myocardial infarction. Methods 80 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in our hospital from February 2014 to December 2016 were divided into two groups of 40 patients. The control group was given routine care route. The observation group was given emergency nursing route. The evaluation time of two groups of patients was compared. Emergency residency, rescue time, length of hospital stay, and recurrent and reintroduced PCI in hospital. Results There was significant difference between the two groups in assessment time, emergency stay time, rescue time and hospitalization time (P <0.05). The recurrence rate of myocardial infarction in observation group and control group was 4.4% and 17.8%, and the incidence of re-PCI was 6.7 % And 22.2%, respectively, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion The emergency nursing pathway can shorten the emergency and rescue time and reduce the operation errors and adverse events, so it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.