论文部分内容阅读
为迎接高考,很多学校用两年的时间授完高中阶段的课程,再用一年的时间进行高考复习.采取这种做法的主观原因是,89年以前的高考数学试题偏离课本的题目过多.所以不得不花一年的时间进行复习,把课本的一些内容进行拓宽。采取这种做法有下列弊病: 1.三年的课程压为两年上,使学生负担过重、每天所学的内容过多,消化不了,由于时间紧,教师在教学中忙于完成教学任务,没有时间处理好课本的重难点,把过多的问题留到高考复习时解决. 2.新授课与复习课之间脱节,使高中阶段的教学工作没有一个很好的总体规划. 3.课本编排的内容是教学大纲的反映,而用一年时间进行高考复习却以复习资料为主,忽视了课本的作用。
To meet the college entrance examination, many schools use two years to finish the high school curriculum, and then spend one year reviewing the college entrance examination. The subjective reason for adopting this approach is that the mathematics questions in the college entrance examination from 89 years ago are too far from the subject of the textbook. Therefore, we had to spend a year reviewing and broadening some of the textbooks. There are the following shortcomings in adopting this approach: 1. The three-year course pressure is two years, which makes the students overburdened, overdoing what they learn, and not digesting it. Because of the tight schedule, teachers are busy with teaching tasks in teaching. There is no time to deal with the difficulty of textbooks and leave too many problems to be solved when the college entrance examination is reviewed. 2. There is a disconnect between the new teaching and the review class, so that the teaching work in the high school stage does not have a good overall plan. 3. Textbook layout The content of the curriculum is a reflection of the syllabus, and reviewing the college entrance examination for one year is mainly based on reviewing the materials and ignoring the function of the textbook.