论文部分内容阅读
“五四”运动是近现代中国历史研究中一个持久而常新的课题,它也深受国外学术界的关注。近来因着手为《五四与现代中国》丛书编辑一本国外“五四”研究文集,有机会浏览了近年来国外“五四”研究的一些论著。本文拟择要评介几种有代表性的观点,借以探讨国外“五四”研究的新趋势,及其可资借鉴的新思路。(一)华裔美国学者张灏1986年在台湾《当代》杂志的纪念“五四”专栏中,发表了《五四运动的批判与肯定》一文,对“五四”的意义进行了新的阐释和评价。张灏在文中指出,“五四”面临的中心课题是“如何重建中国文化”。为此知识分子们提出的答案有两个:一是科学与民主,二是批判中国传统。“五四”知识分子在这两个问题上既有历史功
The “May 4th” Movement is a long-lasting and new topic in the study of modern Chinese history. It is also deeply concerned by the overseas academic community. Recently, as a result of editing an overseas “May Fourth” research essay for the May Fourth and Modern China series, she has had the opportunity to browse some works on foreign “May Fourth” studies in recent years. This article intends to select several representative views to explore the new trend of foreign “May 4” research and its new ideas for reference. (1) Chinese American scholar Zhang Hao published the article “Criticism and affirmation of the May 4th Movement” in the “May 4th” special column of Taiwan’s contemporary magazine in 1986, giving a new interpretation of the significance of the May 4th Movement And evaluation. Zhang Hao pointed out in the article that the central task facing the May 4th Movement is “How to Rebuild Chinese Culture.” There are two answers to this question put forward by the intellectuals: one is science and democracy; the other is the criticism of Chinese tradition. The “May 4th” intellectuals have both historical achievements on these two issues