“虚实”的可操作性

• 作 者: 汤红兵
• 机 构: 重庆三峡学院美术学院,
• 出 处: 艺术教育
• 发表日期: 2007年04期
• 关键词: 虚实 康定斯基 实证科学 古代画家 作性 视觉 肌理 黑白木刻 虚实对比 清晰度

对于形式的分析,从西方到东方来看,西方对形式的分析更具操作性,因为西方对形式的了解主要是从实证科学这个角度来认识的。比如康定斯基对点、线、面的认识,他认为视觉有着科学的量化。而我们对形式的认识却没有,虽然我国古代画家在这方面取得了很高的成就,但对于形式而言,经验化多于实证化。就拿“虚实”来说吧,“虚实”一词在我们的绘画中常常提起,处理好虚实关系,

For the formal analysis, from the west to the east, the western analysis of the form is more operational because the western understanding of the form is mainly from the perspective of empirical science. For example, Kandinsky’s point, line, surface understanding, he believes that the visual science has quantified. However, our understanding of the form is not. Although the ancient painters in our country have made great achievements in this respect, they are more experienced than empirical in form. Take the “fictions” for example. The term “fictions” is often mentioned in our paintings to deal with the relations between falsity and reality.