论文部分内容阅读
一、现行破产法律中关于责任制度规定的现状 目前我国破产制度中关于责任制度的规定内容少,涵盖面小;规定零散不系统:立法意图不甚明确;体例不十分科学;文约例简,可操作性差。突出表现在:一是责任措施不全。《破产法》第41、42条只规定了行政处分和刑事制裁两种方式。而且,对于行政处分,法院只有建议权,往往会出现“大事化小,小事化了”的现象。刑事制裁措施也只规定可以“玩忽职守罪”定罪量刑。对诈欺破产,诈欺和解等各种违法行为是否构成犯
First, the existing bankruptcy law on the status of the provisions of the liability system At present, China’s bankruptcy system on the liability system requires little content, covers a small area; the provisions of scattered non-system: the legislative intent is not clear; the system is not very scientific; Poor operability. Prominent in: First, the responsibility measures are incomplete. Articles 41 and 42 of the Bankruptcy Law only stipulate two ways of administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions. Moreover, the administrative sanctions, the court only has the right to advice, often appear “big things small, small things” phenomenon. Criminal sanctions also only provide for “dereliction of duty” conviction and sentencing. Whether fraudulent and bankruptcy, fraud and other illegal acts constitute a crime