论文部分内容阅读
《物权法》第107条特别规定了遗失物的取得制度。该条规定:所有权人或者其他权利人有权追回遗失物。该遗失物通过转让被他人占有的,权利人有权向无处分权人请求损害赔偿,或者自知道或者应当知道受让人之日起二年内向受让人请求返还原物,但受让人通过拍卖或者向具有经营资格的经营者购得该遗失物的,权利人请求返还原物时应当支付受让人所付的费用。权利人向受让人支付所付费用后,有权向无处分权人追偿。然而,这一制度的规定在法学界引起了巨大的争论,争论的焦点在于这一条款规定的到底是善意取得还是非善意取得,抑或是在善意取得之外的另一种取得制度。由此一来便引发了遗失物取得制度的二元性探讨。
Article 107 of the Property Law specifically stipulates the system for obtaining the lost property. The article provides that the owner or other right holder has the right to recover the lost property. Where the lost property is transferred to someone else for possession, the obligee has the right to claim damages from the undispersed or, within two years from the date of knowing or knowing the assignee, to the assignee, but the assignee If the obligee requests the return of the original by auctioning or purchasing the lost property from a qualified operator, the transferee shall pay the transferee. After the obligee pays the assignee, the obligee has the right to recover from the despots without permission. However, the stipulations of this system have caused a huge debate in the legal science circle. The focus of the debate is whether the provision of this article is obtained either by goodwill or by non-goodwill, or by another system of gaining bona fides. As a result, the duality of the system of obtaining the lost property has been triggered.