论文部分内容阅读
近期,关于OPhone与iPhone的谈论甚嚣尘上。若以销售利润、市场份额、运营战略作为OPhone的得失评判标准,那么民族创新只是战略报告顺带一提的副产品,许多堂皇的标榜和谴责更无必要。如何从国情出发,以合适的配比关注和梳理市场自主和产业政策、民族创新和科技借鉴之于国有手机品牌和操作系统的发展思路,拔开论战迷雾,还原OPhone与iPhone的本来面目?道旁的白桦与峭壁上的松柏无需彼此认可或是相互竞争,亦能各自昂扬。OPhone与iPhone的浅表比较并非终极目的,它们的各自得失,在未来电信市场的彼此影响、借鉴,才是探索重点。本期试图集业人智言,显现我国3G终端发展之一小枚切片。
Recently, the talk about OPhone and iPhone is rampant. If the sales profit, market share, operating strategy as the OPhone’s pros and cons of the evaluation criteria, then national innovation is only a by-product of the strategic report by the incident, many of the magnanimous advertised and condemned even more unnecessary. How to proceed from the national conditions and pay attention to and sort out the market autonomy and industrial policy, national innovation and science and technology from the development of state-owned mobile phone brands and operating systems with the appropriate ratio, unplug the fog of debate, restore the original face of OPhone and iPhone? The white birch beside the cliff and the pine and cypresses on the cliff need not be recognized by each other or compete with each other. OPhone and iPhone superficial comparison is not the ultimate goal, their respective gains and losses, in the future mutual influence of the telecommunications market, learn from, is to explore the focus. In this issue, we try to collect wisdom from the industry and present a small slice of 3G terminal development in China.