论文部分内容阅读
通过文献资料法、理性分析法、比较分析法,在归纳总结中、日、美各国体育课程约束力与灵活性的基础上,比较分析了它们之间的差异,进而对我国体育课程提出了建设性意见,对进一步深化我国体育课程改革具有一定的参照价值。一、中国体育课程的约束力和灵活性清末的体育课程处于起步阶段,还不够成熟,只对体育课程作了粗放的规定,因而约束力很小。民国初的体育课程有了比较明显的进步,这种进步
Through the literature, rational analysis and comparative analysis, on the basis of summarizing the binding and flexibility of the physical education curriculum in Japan, the United States and the United States, the differences between them are analyzed and compared, and then the construction of the physical education curriculum in our country is put forward Sexual opinions have some reference value to further deepen the reform of the PE curriculum in our country. First, the binding and flexibility of China’s physical education curriculum The physical education curriculum in the late Qing Dynasty in its infancy, not mature enough, only made extensive provisions of the physical education curriculum, which binding very small. The beginning of the Republic of China sports curriculum has been more obvious progress, such progress