论文部分内容阅读
现在戏剧数目的减少即纽约戏剧的减少,有许多的因素,每个人都提到的原因是说电影电视拉走了戏院的观众,我觉得这个理由并不完全切中,我向来都不相信一个艺术必定会消灭另一个艺术的价值,不因为有电影就停止看画展,有画展就停止看雕刻,有音乐就停止读书,每一个艺术本身都有生命与用途。 当然一个更有效的解释是经济理由,制作成本正大量提高,我指导的第一出戏,那时每一幕戏的成本需要约六千元,今天同样的一幕戏需要七
Now that the reduction in the number of theaters, the reduction of the New York theater, there are many factors that everybody mentioned because film and television took away the audience of the theater. I think this reason is not completely cut. I have never believed in an art Will certainly destroy the value of another art, not stop the art exhibition because of a movie, stop looking at engraving in the art exhibition, stop reading with music, and each art itself has life and purpose. Of course, a more effective explanation is that for economic reasons, production costs are on the rise. The first drama I directed, at that time, cost about six thousand dollars for each scene. Today, the same scene needs seven