论文部分内容阅读
哲学的目标从根本上说是尝试弄清楚那些与基本的实体论、认识论和标准化问题有关的见解,并充分表达这些见解。通过一种主体间方式,这些见解易于接近和论证。在轴心时代,技术意义上的哲学既不是希腊或欧洲唯一的遗产,也不是在其他社会文化中都能找到的。现代化和全球化的进程产生了促进或至少是发展共同思想观念的必要性。在这种情况之下,哲学的基本问题在对“系统哲学是否可能”这一疑问的需要中产生。系统哲学预设在每一种哲学思想中都有不同的文化创新,这可能会影响到以下各层面的反思和论证:(1)哲学的文化性困境;(2)不同类型的文化中心主义;(3)文化宽容与文化超越。从文化中心主义、宽容与超越的视角看,文化宽容需要不同文化相互感兴趣,且要不断努力在需要理性的地方激发理性,建立人们对某种文化的信任感,并对此持宽容和超越的态度,这可能是当前一项主要的哲学任务。
The philosophical goal is fundamentally trying to understand and adequately express those opinions related to basic substantive, epistemological and standardization issues. Through an inter-subjective approach, these insights are easily accessible and arguable. In the Axial Age, the philosophy of technology was neither the only legacy of Greece nor Europe, nor was it found in other societies and cultures. The process of modernization and globalization has created the need to promote, or at least develop, the concept of common ideas. Under such circumstances, the basic question of philosophy arises from the need of a doubt about the possibility of a systematic philosophy. Philosophical presuppositions have different cultural innovations in every philosophical thought, which may affect the reflection and argumentation at the following levels: (1) the cultural dilemma of philosophy; (2) the different types of cultural centralism; (3) Cultural tolerance and cultural transcendence. From the perspectives of cultural centralism, tolerance and transcendence, cultural tolerance needs different cultures to be interested in each other, and we must make continuous efforts to stimulate rationality in places where rationality needs to be established, and to build people’s sense of trust in a culture and to be tolerant and transcendent This may be one of the major philosophical tasks of the moment.