论文部分内容阅读
提出这个问题,当然不仅仅意在关注批评队伍的年龄构成,尽管青年的批评远远落后于青年的创作。问题主要在于:在创作和欣赏的要求下,文艺批评的观念、方法,它的思维方式、语言风貌,是否存在不相适应的状况,是否有“老化”的现象。马克思说:“消费创造出新的生产需要,因而创造出生产的观念上的内在动机。”同时还“生产出生产者的素质”。文艺创作是创造精神产品,创造美的活动;批评也是创造,而且是创作基础上的再创造。这种素质决定了:它也要象创作一样不断地更新自己。
To put forward this question, of course, is not only intended to focus on the age composition of the critical ranks, although the criticism of young people lags far behind the creation of young people. The main problem lies in whether there is an “aging” phenomenon at the request of creation and appreciation, whether or not the concept and method of literary criticism, its way of thinking, its style of language, and its incompatibility with each other. Marx said: “Consumption creates new production needs, thus creating an inherently motivated concept of production.” It also “produces the quality of the producer.” Literary and artistic creation is to create spiritual products, create beautiful activities; criticism is to create, but also based on the creative creation. This quality decides: it also renews itself as much as it does creation.