论文部分内容阅读
2013年伊始,教育部公布了全国391所高等院校的学科评价排行榜。设计学方面,清华大学高居排名首位,中央美术学院、中国美术学院等专业院校紧随其后。名单公布后,在艺术设计教育领域内引起轩然大波。据称,本次评估“首次采用定量与定性、质量与数量、国内与国外相结合的多维度学术论文评价方法,将论文他引次数、ESI高被引论文数与最新发表的高水平期刊论文同时纳入评价指标”等,似乎具有一种科学意义上的权威性。但正如有论者指出的那样,尽管学科排名至少在一定程度上反映出中国当代高等教育的学科
From the beginning of 2013, the Ministry of Education announced the rankings of discipline evaluation of 391 institutions of higher learning across the country. Design, Tsinghua University ranked first in the ranks of the Central Academy of Fine Arts, China Academy of Art and other professional institutions followed. After the list was announced, it caused an uproar in the field of art and design education. Allegedly, this assessment “for the first time using quantitative and qualitative, quality and quantity, combining domestic and foreign multidimensional evaluation method of academic papers, the papers he quotes, ESI highly cited papers and the latest published high-level periodicals The paper also includes the evaluation index ”, etc., seems to have a scientific sense of authority. However, as some commentators point out, although discipline rankings reflect at least to some extent the discipline of contemporary Chinese higher education