论文部分内容阅读
新修订的《公司法》第十六条第二款赋予了公司为其股东或是实际控制人提供担保的能力,但该条款并未明确规定公司对外担保合同的效力,导致不同法院的法官在适用《公司法》此条款时,存在不同解释,由此引发同案不同判的结果。对此,就有必要分析该条款的效力,以便更好指导实践工作,解决判决冲突问题。
The newly revised Article 16 (2) of the Company Law gives the company the ability to provide guarantees to its shareholders or actual controllers, but the clause does not clearly stipulate the effectiveness of the company’s external guarantee contracts, so that judges of different courts in the There are different interpretations when applying this article of the “Company Law”, which leads to the result of different judgments on the same case. In this regard, it is necessary to analyze the validity of the article in order to better guide practical work to resolve the conflict of judgment.