论文部分内容阅读
文摘社会网络分析方法越来越多地被应用到合著关系研究当中,目前几种合著网络边权计算的方法均存在各自的缺点和不足。本文针对根据合著次数及合著强度计算合著网络边权方法中将文献中各作者之间合著关系做相同处理,而不考虑不同作者之间合著关系强度差异性这一缺点,从作者贡献的角度,引入作者署名次序、通讯作者情况等因素对这种方法进行改进。并对改进前后的结果进行对比分析,结果表明基于作者贡献的合著网络模型比基于作者数量的合著网络模型更好地反映合著状态。
Abstracts Social network analysis methods are more and more applied to the study of co-author relations. At present, there are some shortcomings and shortcomings in the methods of calculating the side-line weights of networks. In this paper, according to the number of co-ordination and co-author strength calculation method of co-author network in the literature between the authors do the same treatment, without considering the strength of co-relationship between different authors, the shortcomings of From the perspective of contribution of authors, this method is improved by introducing the author’s signature order, the author’s situation and other factors. The results show that the co-author network model based on author’s contribution reflects co-operation status better than co-author network model based on the number of authors.