论文部分内容阅读
近来许多新出版的书,因为校对工作做得不好,往往在印成以后才发现错误,于是不得不刊行勘误表作补救,这种消极的表示对读者负责的办法,原是无可厚非的。但以为有了这个办法,就可以对校对工作松懈一下,就太不对了。像上海医学出版社出版的“高级神经活动研究论文集”错误竟有一百余条,正误表达6页之多。有些书虽因发现校对上的错误印了单篇的勘误表,但只夹在书里,不订也不粘连,因此书经数次辗转到读者手里的时候,有的早已丢失了,根本没有起“勘误”的作用。
Recently, many newly published books, because proofreading has not done well and often found errors after it was printed, has had to be corrected by errata. It is no exaggeration to say that such negative representations are responsible to readers. However, I thought that with this measure, we could relax the proofreading work and that would be too wrong. As Shanghai Medical Publishing House published “advanced neural activity research papers,” there are actually more than 100 errors, incorrectly expressed as much as 6 pages. Although some books have found a single corrigendum due to errors found in their proofreading, they are only caught in the book and are neither bound nor glued. Therefore, when the book has been removed to the reader several times, some have long been lost Did not play “errata” role.