论文部分内容阅读
基本案情2010年9月20日,北京某高校对其“元素分析仪及顺序式波长色散X射线荧光光谱仪采购项目”所需设备及服务进行公开招标。招标公告发出后,有四家公司参与投标,四家公司分别为此案原告和三被告A公司、B公司、C公司。原告诉称,在招标过程中,三被告存在恶意串标的事实:吴某和姚某都是C公司的员工,吴某也曾代表C公司参加过其他项目的投标。而在此次开标过程中,吴某代表A公司参加了开标活动,姚某代表B公司
Basic case On September 20, 2010, a university in Beijing conducted an open bidding for the equipment and services required by its “elemental analyzer and sequential wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer procurement project”. After the tender notice was issued, four companies participated in the bidding. The four companies were the plaintiff and the three defendants, A Company, B Company and C Company, respectively. The plaintiff claimed that during the bidding process, the three defendants had the facts of malicious serialization: Wu and Yao both were employees of Company C and Wu had also participated in the bidding of other projects on behalf of Company C. In the bid opening process, Wu A company participated in the opening bidding activities, Yao on behalf of B