论文部分内容阅读
在门球比赛中,双杆球或多杆球起着举足轻重的作用。一场球因某号球员打了个双杆球,将对方临杆球打掉,然后把对方后号球拿来为己方所用,从此己方双杆球甚至多杆球连连出现,使对方只有招架之功,无还手之力,形成了一边倒的局面。于是,一些球友就根据《04规则》附则第3条“可视情况采取不同的方式限制双杆球或多杆球”的规定,呼吁取消或限制双杆球。而我的意见是双杆球还是不限制为好。其理由一是,《04规则》的最大特点是与国际接轨,如果我们取消或限制了双杆球,我们的球员必然在打双杆球、制造双杆球上少下工夫,打造双杆球的技术和能力会大大降低。而国际比赛不限制双杆球和多杆球,我们怎能在国际赛场上取得好成绩呢?其理由二是,造打门前、门后、边角的双杆球,本身是
In the goalkeeper game, double or multi-shot ball plays a decisive role. A ball due to a number of players hit a double-pole, the other Pro pole shot destroyed, and then used to take the other back number for their own use, from one’s own double or even multiple shots appear again and again to make the other side only parry The power, without fighting back, formed a one-sided situation. As a result, some golfers have called for an elimination or restriction of double-bickering in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Fourth Rule, “Different restrictions on double or multiple shots depending on circumstances.” My opinion is double-stick or not limited as well. The first reason is that the “04 rule” is the most important feature of international standards, if we cancel or limit the double-pole, our players are bound to play double-rod, double-rod manufacturing less effort to create double-pole Technology and ability will be greatly reduced. The international competition does not limit the double-rod and multi-shot, how can we get good results in the international arena? The reason is that the two, playing in front of the door, behind the corner double-rod, itself is