人作为价值本身是否可能——与赖金良先生商榷

• 作 者: 刘进田
• 机 构: 西北政法学院政治与公共管理系,
• 出 处: 哲学研究
• 发表日期: 2005年11期
• 关键词: 金良 超验 实证分析方法 价值哲学 语言哲学 哲学价值论 语义分析 价值概念 政治解放 真正的人

This paper puts forward that there is a deep contradiction between the viewpoint and the method in Mr. Lai Jinliang’s paper. He argues that his basic viewpoint that “human is value itself” by using many methods, such as one of the empiricism, formalism, historicism or “transverse-transcendence”, recogiticism, resulting at that man with good and evil is equal to the value itself directly. He explains “the value” by “ought to be”, overturning the logical order between the both terms. He defines “the value” and human being by “time”, result at the loss of human being as the origin of value. Moreover, he confuses “meaning” with “significance”, leading human being and the value annihilated by the recognition. Finally, Lai’s paper clears up human being and the value and goes to his opposite.

This paper puts forward that there is a deep contradiction between the viewpoint and the method in Mr. Lai Jinliang’s paper. He argues that his basic viewpoint that “human is value itself” by using many methods, such as one of the empiricism, formalism, historicism or “transverse-transcendence”, recogiticism, resulting at that man with good and evil is equal to the value itself directly. He explains “the value” by “ought to be”, overturning the logical order between the both terms. He defines “The value” and human being by “time”, result at the loss of human being as the origin of value. Moreover, he confuses “meaning” with “significance”, leading human being and the value annihilated by the recognition. Finally, Lai’s paper clears up human being and the value and goes to his opposite.